Introduction and Background
South Africa recently emerged from more than 300 years of colonial
and apartheid domination. This domination manifested itself in all
spheres of South African life, including media ownership, control
and content. Current legislative/policy changes within the media
therefore need to be looked at within the context of this transformation.
Some of the recent institutional developments include the creation
of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA),
a regulatory authority within the sphere of commercial print and
broadcast media. Other developments include the strengthening of
competition law, specifically the passing of an act regulating ownership
and control of telecommunication services. The act prohibits the
holding of more than one license by a person/company/institution,
which already has a license in any telecommunication service category.
Media Ownership
Prior to 1994, five conglomerates owned and controlled the media
industry in South Africa. Whilst some of these corporations still
play a dominant role in the industry, there has been a significant
dilution of ownership and control due to increasing participation
by previously marginalized groups. This is a product of concerted
effort by government to ensure that the media indeed does reflect
the diversity of our society.
The print media is still predominantly white, and reaches only
about 20% of the population due to illiteracy, the lack of newspapers
in rural areas, and the cost of newspapers. The majority of South
Africans receive news information through radio broadcast and television.
The national broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation
(SABC), continues to control the majority of broadcast outlets.
However, due to the importance of the media in any society, but
more so in our country where we are building a new society founded
on democracy, non racialism and respect for cultural diversity,
it was felt that a more active role needs to be played by the government,
the media industry and donors in determining a new and clear course
for the South African media in the long term. An independent agency,
the Media Diversity and Development Agency (MDDA) was therefore
created to grapple with issues of media diversity and ownership.
Amongst others, the MDDA wants to "encourage ownership and
control of, and access to, media by historically disadvantaged communities,
historically diminished indigenous language and cultural groups,
encourage the channeling of resources to community and small commercial
media, as well as supporting initiatives which promote literacy
and a culture of reading." It is a funding body, but also offers
non-funding support of various kinds to community and non-profit
media. These include direct and indirect subsidies, capacity building
and training, emergency funding and media research. The MDDA is
seen as a catalyst for transforming the media in South Africa. The
rationale for involving the media industry is that the commercial
media is bound to benefit from an expanding readership and listership.
The Role of the Public Broadcaster
South Africa's broadcasting system comprises public, commercial,
and community broadcasters. Freedom of expression and journalistic,
creative and programming independence of broadcasters and independence
of regulation are guaranteed by section 192 of the constitution.
Chapter one of the broadcasting act states that "a public
service is necessary for the maintenance of South African identity,
universal access, equality, unity and diversity."
Another objective that the broadcasting act sets for the national
broadcasters is:
- Contribute to democracy, development of society, gender
equality, nation building, provision of education and strengthening
the spiritual and moral fibre of society.
The Broadcasting act also obliges the national broadcaster to amongst
others:
- Make services available to South Africans in all official
languages
- Reflects both the unity and diverse cultural and multilingual
nature of South Africa and all of its cultures and regions to
audiences.
- Enrich the cultural heritage of South Africa by providing
support for traditional and contemporary artistic expression.
- Include programmes made by the corporation as well
as those commissioned from the independent production sector.
Cultural Diversity
Acknowledgement and promotion of our diversity is prominent in
our constitution. Amongst others, the constitution makes provision
for the recognition of eleven languages as official languages. The
policies of the national broadcaster, the telecommunications regulatory
authority, ICASA, our national policies on media and communications
to mention but a few, all emphasize and are geared towards promoting
South African culture and its diversity. We see our cultural diversity
as a source of strength and richness. We also use our diversity
to promote nation building, social cohesion, national identity and
pride. This should also be looked at from a context, where in the
past, both racial and ethnic differences were used to foster divisions
in our society. Therefore, our understanding of cultural diversity
transcends narrow ethnic identity and is mindful of the legacies
of divisions and racism.
In this era of globalization, we believe that promoting and preserving
cultural diversity allows holders of unique cultures the ability
to enter or adapt to globalization on their own terms rather than
those of a dominant culture. Preserving and promotion of cultural
diversity is not equal to protectionism. Our view is that it is
embodied in products and performances of different sectors of society
and ensures a diversity of domestic and foreign content
Research done by our national regulator (ICASA), demonstrates that
there is widespread commitment to producing and seeing South African
content on both television and radio, and that South African broadcasters
exceed their quota requirements. The research also indicates that
quotas facilitate economic opportunities for many South Africans.
Our current quota requirements are as follows: Public service radio
stations 40%, community radio stations 40% and commercial radio
stations 25%. For television, the public service broadcasting 55%,
commercial free to air television 35%, terrestrial subscription
services 8%. Quotas are constantly reviewed to assess their impact
on the industry. The current quota requirements will be reviewed
in 2007.
Conclusion
The media has and does play an important role in the promotion
of cultural diversity. Our own experience is that government needs
to come with strategic interventions to ensure that the media is
sensitive to issues around cultural diversity. Also important is
the ability to engage and persuade the media industry, rather than
threaten them with punitive measures. We attribute high levels of
compliance with our quota requirements to this engagement.
However, our challenge remains regulations around media ownership.
Ownership changes hands all the time. It is therefore difficult
to strike a balance between attracting investments in the industry
and simultaneously ensuring that domestic ownership of the media
is not diluted. This is particularly so in the context of a developing
country such as ours, where you have to deal with many competing
priorities.
Another challenge is managing the relationship between the national
broadcaster and government, often, when the government complains
about anything concerning the national broadcaster, be it content
or operations, the immediate response is to perceive those concerns
as interference.
Back to Top |