INCP - RIPC International Network on Cultural Policy
  English Français Español
  About Us | Member Countries | What's New | Announcements | Contact Us
•  Home
•  Contact Group
•  Liaison Bureau
•  Ministerial Meetings
•  Mid-Year Officials Meeting
•  Working Groups
•  Special Policy Research Teams
•  Cultural Observatories
•  Links
•  Search
Home: Annual Meetings: 2000: 3rd Annual Ministerial Meeting
Réunions annuelles

Santorini Statement

Santorini, 27-29 September 2000

Hellas, Armenia, Austria, Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Cuba,
France, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Mexico, Norway, Russia,
Senegal, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Ukraine.

On 27-29 September 2000, the Ministers of the International Network on Cultural Policy (INCP), observers from international organizations, and other countries met in Santorini where they expressed their commitment to continue promoting cultural diversity. This year`s informal policy discussions, hosted by the Hellenic Republic and chaired by the Honorable Theodoros Pangalos, Minister of Culture,
focussed on the challenges for cultural policy in the 21st century, particularly in the context of globalization.

The meeting revolved around three roundtables:

Cultural Heritage – A Dynamic Factor in Cultural Continuation: Ministers explored the role of tangible and intangible heritage. Discussions addressed the challenges and opportunities of protecting and promoting heritage for social and economic development, including the potential offered by cultural tourism.

Guiding Parameters in Globalization - Cultural Diversity and Identity: Ministers examined the growing importance of cultural diversity and identity in an increasingly globalized world. Discussions explored the proposal for an international instrument to promote cultural diversity.

Back to Top

Implications for National Action: Ministers discussed the role of governments in the protection, promotion and enhancement of cultural diversity, identity and heritage. Discussions examined national cultural policies and policy tools in a global economy.

The advancement of communications technologies, along with the abundance of information in today’s knowledge-based society, is creating a new environment for culture. While offering vast new opportunities for creativity and development, new trends - particularly globalization - are challenging our notions of identity and sovereignty. The Network Ministers concluded that:

  • the preservation of cultural heritage and its creative use in social and economic development are important components of sustainable human development and should be harnessed to improve people's quality of life, particularly for disadvantaged groups, and to engage youth through education;
  • cultural diversity is integral to social cohesion, human development, peaceful coexistence, and the prosperity of societies;
  • governments should promote an environment that nurtures diverse cultural expressions while participating fully in the global economy.

Ministers agreed to launch a Working Group on Cultural Heritage that will examine different ways that tangible and intangible heritage (traditional, contemporary, and industrial) could better serve economic and social development. Skills development and capacity-building were identified as urgent priorities. The Working Group will be chaired by Mexico.

Ministers also agreed to launch a working group to examine the new challenges facing broadcasting in a global context. The Working Group will be chaired by Italy.

Ministers welcomed the discussion paper “International Responses to the Challenges Facing Cultural Diversity” by the Working Group on Cultural Diversity and Globalization. The Working Group identified an international instrument on cultural diversity as a focal point for considering new ways to promote diversity of cultural expression and identity. This approach would provide an effective tool that embodies
shared attitudes on cultural diversity and expands on previous international cultural commitments. The Network Ministers charged the Working Group to continue it work by elaborating on the framework and scope of a cultural diversity instrument for their 2001 Annual Meeting. As a first step, the Network endorsed the Working Group’s illustrative list of principles as an effective starting point for building consensus on a shared vision for the instrument. (See attached annex for the list)

Ministers also acknowledged the importance of linking domestic cultural policy development to global initiatives. In a globalizing world, domestic cultural policies should be developed through partnerships between governments and civil society (including the private sector and non- governmental organizations).

Ministers welcomed the parallel conference of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) (September 24th to 26th) which launched a new NGO International Network for Cultural Diversity (INCD). In its statement presented to Network Ministers, the NGOs urged that governments make no international commitments which would compromise cultural policy objectives at home, and that they pursue an
international cultural diversity instrument. They further suggested that future dialogue between the Network and the INCD will contribute to effective global policies and approaches to promote cultural diversity.

The Ministers welcomed Senegal as a new member of the Ministerial Contact Group. The third annual meeting of Network Ministers closed with a commitment to further discussion at the next meeting of Ministers in Lucerne, Switzerland in 2001. A working session of the Network on the issue of cultural diversity and governance will also take place in Switzerland in early 2001. South Africa will host the meeting in 2002. Croatia, Armenia, and Austria each offered to host future annual meetings.

Back to Top

ANNEX

Illustrative List of Cultural Diversity Principles

The Working Group on Cultural Diversity and Globalization produced a discussion paper entitled “International Responses to the Challenges Facing Cultural Diversity”. This report proposed an illustrative set of ten cultural principles drawn from existing instruments and based on the Working Group study, “Catalogue of International Principles Pertaining to Culture”. The Network agrees that an
international instrument on cultural diversity is a worthwhile undertaking, and this illustrative list of principles provides an effective starting point for building consensus on the instrument’s vision and objectives.

  1. The fundamental importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in particular Article 27 - “Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits”.
  2. The preservation of cultural heritage is a crucial component of identity and self- understanding that links a community to its past.
  3. Art plays an essential role in the life and development of the individual and society States must protect, defend, and assist their artists and artistic freedom.
  4. Linguistic and ethno-cultural diversity helps maintain and develop national and international cultural richness and traditions and reflects a commitment to common values and social cohesion.
  5. Authors and rights holders have the right to the protection of their moral and material interests regarding creation.
  6. Cultural goods and services should be fully recognized and treated as being not like other forms of merchandise.(1)
  7. Social and cultural fulfillment of the individual is a key element of human development and must be integral to sustainable development approaches.
  8. Cultural exchange and cooperation are necessary to build wider cultural allegiances in an increasingly globalized world and are important tools in building human security.
  9. Cultural diversity includes an openness to a wide range of cultural influences and recognizes the importance the production and distribution of local content.
  10. Governments have a role to play in preserving and promoting cultural diversity and respect for
    cultural diversity is an important element of developing good governance.

1 Stockholm Action Plan, 1998, Objective 3.

Back to Top

 

 www.incp-ripc.org
 
 

About Us | Member Countries | What's New | Announcements | Contact Us